Monday, December 31, 2007

FILM REVIEWS: TOP FILMS OF 2007


Daniel Day-Lewis in There Will Be Blood. 

There Will Be Blood tops an exceptional year in film.

By John Esther, CJ Johnson, Ed Rampell and Don Simpson 

John Esther’s Top Ten

With few exceptions, as the year progressed toward its finale, the quality of films continued to rise. By the time November hit, bad movies were fewer and farther in between than in any time in recent memory.

Yes, there were those blockbusters and top grossing movies each week (Knocked Up; Superbad; Transformers) suggesting the overall intelligence of moviegoers had not changed from the previous years, but underneath the commercial radar there were a plethora of films and documentaries for anyone who wanted more out of a film than escape.

These films were a welcoming image in a year that saw the deaths of the legendary filmmakers Michelangelo Antonioni (The Red Desert; Blow-Up) and  Ingmar Bergman (The Seventh Seal; Fanny & Alexander), who died within a few dozen hours this summer. Thus, unlike previous years where one has to strain to find a top ten, this year I found myself arguing over which films would make the cut.

In alphabetical order:

Control -- Anton Corbijn and writer Matt Greenhalgh’s biopic on the life and tragic death of Joy Division singer-scribe Ian Curtis gave proper analysis to one of the most significant bands of the past 30 years. Joy Division personified the post-punk artistic awareness of an alienated existence free of comprehension and companionship that only music (art) could redeem. To understand the existential, dislocation and discontent in Curtis’ lyrics Corbijn and company meticulously capture the monotony of his life. Containing the best soundtrack in a year of many good soundtracks, Control did the poetics of Joy Division and its many fans a tremendous service and experience.

The Diving Bell and the Butterfly -- Based on the bestseller book Le Scaphandre et Le Papillon by Jean-Dominique Bauby with a screenplay by Ronald Hardwood director Julian Schnabel this French film went for the heart and mind as it followed the true harrowing and redemptive life of Bauby (Matthew Amalric). Told primarily through the post-massive stroke Bauby’s single eye, the film begins to channel Bauby’s transformation from self-pity to self-realization. In the process Bauby developed a profound sense of love for the human condition, the beauty of some individuals, the power of the imagination and how true care is far more rewarding than any material comfort.

I'm Not There -- Offering a plethora of semiotic signifiers the complex biopic was more for fans of Haynes’ films than it was for Dylan fans looking for a chronological, traditional look at the artist. There are plenty of Dylan songs throughout the film and Dylan did give his blessing, but I’m Not There deliberately, often randomly, obscured the artist only to switch gears and capture some profound insights into what is it that made Dylan, well, Dylan. The use of several actors playing Dylan worked on several levels to remind and masquerade the ideas behind what it means to recreate recent history on celluloid.

In the Valley of Elah -- I have never been a Paul Haggis (Million Dollar Baby; Crash) fan yet if I had to pick my very favorite film of the year, it would have to be this stunning portrayal of how war can wreck one community after another. After serving a tour of duty in Iraq, Mike Deerfield (Jonathan Tucker) disappears. Not pleased with the locale investigation, Mike's father Hank Deerfield (Tommy Lee Jones) does some detective work of his own--with the assistance of Det. Emily Sanders (Charlize Theron). What Hank, his wife (Susan Sarandon) and others  find and reveal are no soft blows. Courageous, selfless, extremely well written, superbly-acted and wonderfully shot by Roger Deakins, few films leave such a lasting impression on a viewer as In the Valley of Elah.

Look -- Every week an estimated four billion hours of footage is caught on surveillance cameras in the United States. While that is not much of a shock in our every increasing techno world, the way we respond to what we see is what is at stake in writer-director Adam Rifkin’s video-slave new world. Intertwining several stories about deception, destruction, distastefulness and de-composure, this film illustrated a nation of voyeurs generally looking at others but not seeing them; voyeurs watching tragedy unfold but not responding to it; voyeurs responding to a crime instead of preventing one; voyeurs obsessed with sensation yet antagonistic toward sensitivity; voyeurs gazing at their own humanistic demise and adapting instead of rebelling.


The Rape of Europa -- In a year of uneasy films to digest, director-writers Richard Berge, Bonnie Cohen and Nicole Newnham's documentary was a welcome meal. The most comprehensive documentary about the relevance of art, art collection and art preservation during World War II, this awesome trio details at length how people died to save their precious national art while the Third Reich was busy trading, stealing and destroying art across Europe. Russians living  in the basement of The Hermitage starved to save their art while a clever French museum curator in France "spied" for the world of art as American art historians were brought into Italy to show the Allies  where they should not bomb. Unlike most documentaries about World War II Europe, this one is primarily about the good people.

The Simpsons Movie --  Twenty years in the making, watching The Simpsons and company on the big screen was mesmerizing. Dense colors, elaborate background scenes, detail crowd shots, I could watch this movie with the sound off and be entertained. To say this was the best example of a show being adapted from the small screen to the big screen would hardly be an endorsement since most of those adaptations are junk. Not only was the The Simpsons Movie the best adaptation of that kind, it is also the best-animated movie ever.

Talk to Me -- Taking a huge leap in artistic merit, director Kasi Lemmons¹ (Eve¹s Bayou, TheCaveman¹s Valentine) latest film tells the story of legendary radio DJ Ralph Waldo “Petey” Greene (Don Cheadle). Focusing on this life from the late 1960s and on, Greene was a man from the streets of Washington, D.C., whose direct, elocutionary confrontation with authority  represented a new voice in America. Highlighted by engaging performances, Terrance Blanchard’s able score and intelligent screenwriting by Michael Genet and Rick Famuyiwa, at every turn Lemmons splinters the characters, images and themes just enough that they connect and diverge--piecing together an unraveling nation.

There Will Be Blood -- Writer-director Paul Thomas Anderson (Boogie Nights; Punch Drunk Love) took one long great leap forward in his career with his adaptation of Upton Sinclair's Oil!.  Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day-Lewis in phenomenal form), an early 20th century prospector, con artist and misanthrope to the core, slowly connives everyone in his pathway between Little Boston (Bakersfield, Ca.), where he repeatedly strikes oil to the shores of San Luis Obispo,. Not for the mawkish moviegoer, this nearly flawless 158-minute film about the past is, in many ways, an allegory for the present.  A superior version of American Gangster.

The Other Woman -- Italy's Oscar selection chronicles the horrific plight of a Ukranian women (a fantastic Kseniya Rappoport) sold into sexual slavery and how she tries to deal with life after escaping. Her salvation is a little girl she believes is one of  her daughters and Irena will stop at nothing to be with her, including enduring more exploitation, attempted murder and the inevitable crushing heartbreak.  From the opening frame Guiseppe Tornatore makes it quite clear that he is sick of the degradation that too many women, including those in cinema, are too often expected to endure to please the male gaze. Featuring a riveting score by Ennio Morricone.

CJ Johnson’s Top Ten

The Diving Bell and the Butterfly -- Julian Schnabel’s adaptation of the extraordinary memoir by Jean Dominique Beauby whom, at the age of 43, suffered a massive stroke leaving him completely paralyzed without any control over any part of his body except for his left eye. This is perhaps the most tremendously affecting film I've seen in years. Not only is the cinematography genuinely innovative, but the performances do what few are able to accomplish: they render you speechless. Harrowing, heartening and life affirming this was the most essential film of the year.

No Country For Old Men -- Beautiful poetry from the brothers Coen. No Country For Old Men is a disquieting cat-and-mouse chase between the law and cold blooded hit men, the hunter and the hunted, painted with extraordinary poetic images to reflect the ugliness of a society that (for all intents and purposes) is without hope of redemption: ours. Neither an action movie nor a suspense-thriller in the usual sense of the phrase, it does feel like one due to the volatile and searing intensity of the performances, namely Tommy Lee Jones and Javier Bardem.

There Will Be Blood -- Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day Lewis) is the ruthless oilman who is the consummate manifestation of the evils of capitalism in Paul Thomas Anderson’s There Will Be Blood. An exploration on the themes of Upton Sinclair’s novel Oil! There Will Be Blood is a magnificent historical epic, with enough grit and guts to make Giant look like a happily-ever-after fairytale. Lewis’ performance much lauded performance is entirely merited, and he is solely responsible for turning Anderson’s film, which is not without its faults, into something of a masterpiece.

La Vie en Rose -- This fascinating film about the life of legendary French chanteuse Edith Piaf is more than a biopic. Its a richly textured portrait; an explosive medley of color and passion; of pain and frustration; painted with a vivacious musical palette. Dahan has certainly not created the formulaic biopic, which itself is commendable, and his casting of fearless Marion Cotillard as Piaf was sheer genius: she ignites the screen in one of the strongest performances of the year. Period. Cotillard’s strength and Dahan’s driving vision result in a film that is (although imperfect) visually enrapturing, thoughtful, impressionistic and painfully sad.

This is England -- The film’s cut-the-crap sensibility and rebellious social humor,make it the sort of film that only a straightforward midlands lad like director Shane Meadows could pull off. Meadows’ story follows 12-year-old Shaun (Thomas Turgoose) whose desperate need for acceptance and some sense of identity prompts him into joining a skinhead gang in depressed Nottingham in Thatcher’s early 80s England. We see Shaun slide from what is initially harmless hooliganism into a violent militancy that is relentlessly uncomfortable to watch. Defying genre, This is England is political, historical and, most importantly, acutely personal.

Control -- Movies about rock and roll tragedies either get it right (Sid and Nancy) or get it horribly wrong (The Doors). So a massive hurrah is in order to first-time director Anton Corbijn because Control’s account of the explosive life of Joy Division singer Ian Curtis (played by the ferociously good Sam Riley) is an unexpectedly visceral and refreshingly human experience. Curtis is an often-explosive character with complex emotional and physical issues, but Corbijn’s film remains pointedly reticent and his shrewd use of dingy black-and-white photography, so appropriate to its setting of late ‘70s Manchester, gives the film a necessary sobriety too keep it from falling into the tortured artist sentimentalism that would have certainly befallen a lesser film — and lesser filmmaker.

Paris, Je T’aime --  If you’ve ever kept a travel journal, been in love, been divorced, or really, if you have any kind of pulse at all then there is something for you in Paris, Je T’aime. This collection of twenty short films comes from an impressive array of filmmakers (everyone from the Coens to Craven to CuarĂ³n) who use the city of lights as the backdrop (or as the main character) for vignettes that range from the unabashedly saccharine to challenging little curiosities. Some work, some don’t, but they all have the darn-dest way of staying with you long after the film has ended. It’s a wonderfully original all around experience, and the most beautiful declaration of love to any city in recent memory.

Zodiac -- Frustrating and frantic and fabulous. Demanding absolute attention to detail, Zodiac wanders and twists, confounds and infuriates, curdles your blood and, after almost three hours, leaves you utterly worn out. This isn’t so much about the actual nefarious zodiac killer of 1960s San Francisco fame as it is about the various lives that are affected by it: in particularly, Jake Gyllenhaal’s obsession of it and Robert Downey Jr’s capitalization of it. A thriller that is truly thrilling in the most unexpected of ways.

The King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters --  George Bailey meets Mr. Potter gaming style. Billy Mitchell is a 25-year-old Donkey Kong champ with a fanatical drive to maintain his title and an ego big enough to make Prada’s Miranda look like Mother Theresa. Standing in his way is the virtuous “Wiebe,” a hard working, upright kid from Middle America with no delusions of grandeur, only the dream to dethrone the villainous Mitchell. Director Seth Gordon’s King of Kong is the most unexpectedly moving underdog film of the year, and the best part? It’s a documentary.

Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street: -- Tim Burton and Johnny Depp’s sixth collaboration, delivers exactly what it promises: blood, guts and Victorian grunge. This adaptation of Steven Sondheim’s 1979 marvellously morbid musical has Depp stepping up to the plate to reveal himself to be a surprisingly strong musical lead, and Bonham Carter is balefully beautiful in a frighteningly mad way (making up for her less than impressive singing chops). It’s a gory, psychological thriller, intense and intelligent, but the best thing about Todd is its surprising wallop of emotional depth—this may not be the best Burton-Depp film (that title rightly rests with Ed Wood) but it is the most affecting … and effective.


Ed Rampell’s Top Ten

I’m a big fan of movies that are cinematic – that is, motion pictures that use the attributes unique to the medium of cinema. I love film form, from the rapid montage of a Sergei Eisenstein to the long tracking shots of a Michelangelo Antonioni to the picturesque tableaux of John Ford to the sweeping long shots of David Lean to – well, you get the picture. But let’s face it, storytelling, characters and content are even more important for most moviegoers. So for my Top 10 list, I selected films based on their progressive politics.

And the winners are:

In the Valley of Elah – War and peace figured mightily in 2007’s politically aware cinema, as 21st century Leo Tolstoys crafted consciousness and conscience into content, starting with Paul Haggis’ meditation on Iraq and the post-traumatic stress disorder many soldiers suffer, especially when fighting for a pack of lies. Elah’s mournful ensemble cast includes activist/actress Susan Sarandon, Tommy Lee Jones and Charlize Theron caught up in a troubled – and troubling – American imperium. 

Redacted – Brian De Palma’s powerful expose of war crimes committed by GIs in Iraq is revolutionary in both form and content. It is worth noting that only one major studio feature was released during the Vietnam War that was set in the Indochina conflict – John Wayne’s gung ho (and I don’t mean Ho Chi Minh) The Green Berets. However, fiction films today have already trained their sites on Iraq, Afghanistan and the so-called “War on Terror,” and it ain’t a pretty sight.

Lions for Lambs – Robert Redford directed and co-starred with Meryl Streep and Tom Cruise in this penetrating look at Neo-conservatives, the corporate media and the Afghan War. Michael Pena, who played a 9/11 survivor in Oliver Stone’s 2006 World Trade Center, is shrewdly cast as a soldier who has volunteered to take the fight to Osama – with disastrous results.

Charlie Wilson’s War – Mike Nichols’ movie takes us back to the original U.S. incursion into Afghanistan – call it “Afghan War I.” Some may simplistically see this highly entertaining movie co-starring Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts and Philip Seymour Hoffman as a pro-war patriotic picture. But it can also be viewed as a cautionary tale of the folly of a freelance foreign policy carried out by the CIA and Congress that saw Washington insanely back Islamic extremism, which directly gave rise to Osama Bin Laden. Listen to the jets Congressman Wilson (Hanks) hears on his balcony at the end – they are Osama’s boys headed for the Twin Towers and D.C., as the CIA’s most expensive covert operation ever inevitably leads to catastrophic blowback.

Rendition – Gavin Hood explores the CIA’s extraordinary rendition program, with its secret prisons and torture in this expose of the Bush regime’s overzealous techniques during the “War on Terror” that itself uses terrorist tactics. An ensemble cast including Meryl Streep, Reese Witherspoon, Jake Gyllenhaal, Omar Metwally and Yigal Naor brings this gripping drama about the ultimate Hitchcockian “wrong man” alive.

Across the Universe – Speaking, or rather singing, of peace, Julie Taymor uses the Beatles’ music (although not the Fab Four themselves) to resurrect the 1960s’ antiwar movement and counterculture in this musical with Evan Rachel Wood, Jim Sturgess and, in cameos, Salma Hayek, Joe Cocker and Eddie Izzard.

Michael Clayton – Progressive filmmakers also tackled other topics in issue-oriented films, such as Tony Gilroy’s anti-Big Ag drama starring George Clooney, Michael Wilkinson and Sydney Pollack as lawyers on the horns of an ethical dilemma.

There Will Be Blood – Based on socialist Upton Sinclair’s novel, Paul Thomas Anderson’s adaptation raises the “no blood for oil” theme, as it explores the American oil industry and Christian evangelism. Paul Dano puts the mental into fundamentalism as the wacky preacher Eli Sunday, while Daniel Day-Lewis delivers a powerhouse performance as a Citizen Kane-like petroleum robber baron, who gains the world as he loses his soul.

Sicko – With his usual wit, panache and boldness, Michael Moore tackles the state of American healthcare and insurance in this documentary that dares paint a human picture of France and Cuba.

The Great Debaters – Denzel Washington directed 2007’s Best Progressive Picture, A film about class struggle in academia and the cotton fields of the Deep South during the Great Depression. Denzel portrays the real life poet Melvin Tolson, an academic and debate team couch by day, and rabblerousing Red at night. Tolson organizes white and black farmers and sharecroppers to fight for truth, justice and the progressive way in this stand-up-and-cheer anti-racist movie co-produced by Oprah and co-starring Forest Whitaker and John Heard.

Don Simpson’s Top Ten

The fantastic cinematic output of 2007 exists in stark contrast to that of 2006 (which will go down as one of the more lackluster years in the history of cinema). Politics took the forefront and Hollywood finally began to show its leftist tendencies (after six years of curtailing them) with an exponential increase in unabashed critiques of the military endeavors by the U.S. during President Bush’s reign. Race and the environment were also big issues this year, while feminist issues (most notably abortion) seemed to be less worthy of discussion (thanks in part to Juno and Knocked Up). This year also marks the release of two films that are as close to cinematic perfection as I have witnessed in many years: The Diving Bell and the Butterfly and There Will Be Blood.

The Diving Bell and the Butterfly – Writer-director Julian Schnabel’s kino-eye stylishly captures the dying days of French Elle editor (Jean-Dominique Bauby) while trapped inside his paralyzed body. Startlingly beautiful cinematography (Janusz Kaminski) and a script (adapted from Bauby’s memoir by Ronald Harwood) that takes existentialism to higher levels, The Diving Bell and Butterfly is Schnabel’s most significant contribution to the world of art and beyond. Pure eye-candy and mind-candy, this is cinematic perfection in my eyes.

There Will Be Blood – This is a film that is destined to go down in cinema history as one of the great epic masterpieces. The cinematography (Robert Elswit), editing (Dylan Tichenor) and soundtrack (Radiohead’s Jonny Greenwood) seem avant-garde in comparison to anything recent but they all work in faithful worship of the great masters of cinema’s past. Daniel Day-Lewis’s pitch-perfect performance as oil tycoon Daniel Plainview is as dastardly as the devil himself.

I’m Not There – Layered with references (many that only the most astute Dylan scholars will appreciate), the non-traditional narrative of Todd Haynes’ artful homage to the many personas of Bob Dylan is primed to blow as many minds as when Dylan went electric. Far from a bio-pick, Haynes use of multiple characters to play various eras of Dylan works surprisingly well (though the casting of Richard Gere as the Woodstock-era Dylan is the film’s most notable flaw).

Southland Tales – With Godard as my witness, I bask in the essence of difficult cinema (and, yes, I realize I am basking in almost solitary confinement on this one). Southland Tales utilizes the rapid-fire news tactics of Fox News, bombarding and overwhelming the audience with various theories, words and images; but instead of telling the audience what to think (like Fox News does), writer-director Richard Kelly gets down on one knee and pleads with his audience to think for themselves and come to their own conclusions. Amen!

The Simpson’s Movie – Finally! My namesakes from Springfield (my hometown) made their way onto the silver screen. I can’t say I was 100% satisfied with the result (admittedly my expectations were totally unattainable) but, as with the television show, it is still better than most everything else.

Black Book – Director Paul Verhoeven returned to his birthplace (the Netherlands) and made the best film of his career. It is the structure and pacing of the narrative (and Carice van Houten’s lead performance as Rachel/Ellis) that make this one of the best WWII thrillers.

Hannah Takes the Stairs – Naturally bare with unbridled honesty and simplicity (and aesthetically saturated with Eric Rohmer and Hal Hartley’s influences), combined with director Joe Swanberg’s refreshingly nonchalant attitude toward sexuality and nudity, this is the best that the fruitful “Mumblecore” scene has offered so far.

Control – Joy Division is one of my favorite bands of all-time, and Anton Corbijn’s directorial debut did not disappoint. The lush black and white cinematography perfectly reflects the doom and gloom of the gray old 1970s England that spawned Joy Division.

Into the Wild – The mood and atmosphere of Sean Penn’s fourth directorial effort are as transfixing as the acting performances (most notably Emile Hirsch as Christopher McCandless). Into the Wild is a beautiful study of McCandless’ attempt to escape the grasp of capitalism, as he also slowly comes to terms with the human necessity of companionship.

Sicko – Michael Moore is far from flawless. I don’t agree with everything he does or says (or many of his tactics), but I have to admit the dude has a true gift for crafting captivating documentaries. Sicko brings a lot of important issues to the table concerning the state of the health care system in the U.S. – though, whether or not it will bring about any changes is left in the hands of the voting public.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: ADAM RIFKIN AND BARRY SCHULER



Look at what writer-director Adam Rifkin has here. 

Watching you watch others move

By John Esther

Smile, cry, laugh, snide, fornicate, lie, intoxicate, drive, kidnap, kill and die, but always beware and be obliged: it is hard to hide from the increasing presence of the surveillance camera on the ground, behind the walls and in the sky.

Every week an estimated four billion hours of footage is caught on surveillance cameras in the United States. While that is not much of a shock in our every increasing techno world, the way we respond to what we see is what is at stake in writer-director Adam Rifkin’s Look.

Intertwining several stories about deception, destruction, distastefulness and de-composure, this 2007 standout illustrates a nation of voyeurs looking at others but not seeing them; voyeurs watching tragedy unfold but not responding to it; voyeurs responding to a crime instead of preventing one; voyeurs obsessed with sensation yet antagonistic toward sensitivity; voyeurs gazing at their own humanistic demise and adapting instead of resisting.

While some interpreters may find Look a confirmation of George Orwell’s 1984-predictions, it could be contested that this is an argument for Big Brother’s surveillance cameras as a means to protect us from ourselves. If only the personnel privy to the images engaged him or herself to what they saw and responded accordingly.

Featuring riveting stories, authentic performances by a relatively unknown cast and a systematic analysis into what it means to be watched and recorded on a frequent basis, this is a big leap forward for Rifkin, whose credits include Night at the Golden Eagle, The Dark Backward and Detroit Rock City. (Is the government watching me as I praise this film?)


Along with Rifkin, in this exclusive interview we also spoke to one of the film’s producers, Barry Schuler, the AOL, videogame and Interactive media pioneer.

JEsther Entertainment: I understand the genesis for this film was when you received a photo of you committing a traffic violation?
Adam Rifkin: I got a red light ticket. When the picture came in the mail from the police department, I opened it up and there was a clear photo of me running the red light. I thought to myself that this was a little unnerving. Somebody can take a photo of me without my knowledge and mail it to my home address. I started wondering what other cameras are out there photographing me without my knowledge. I started paying attention to where the other cameras were. Everybody knows there are cameras in ATM machines, banks and airports, but I was unaware of just how many there is everywhere. It started to sink in that this would be an interesting way to shoot a movie. I did a little research and found out we were captured 170 times a day on surveillance cameras. Those numbers jumped to 200 times a day by the time we finished the movie and they just continue to grow. The story is topical. It’s an issue about the right to privacy.

JE: Nobody in the film is captured making a traffic violation. Were any of the stories in the film autobiographical?
AR: Nothing was autobiographical per se, but I wanted the characters and the storylines to be relatable to anybody. That’s why I chose characters that could be from any walk of life.

JE: You said at a previous discussion that one of your primary objectives for making this film was to get people talking. Do you have any other larger political objectives?
AR: This is a very relevant issue right now. What side of the fence are you on? Do you think these cameras are an invasion of your privacy? Do you think it’s George Orwell’s nightmare come true? Do you feel the more cameras we have the safer society is? It’s too complex of an issue to say that it’s black or white. That’s why I wanted to show both sides of the movie. I’m hoping the movie will spark that discussion.
Barry Schuler: When you talk about a larger political agenda, what is happening by default is the number of cameras growing every day. They’re networked together. All of it is digital. It keeps capturing stuff into hard drives that stays around forever. It’s searchable forever. More than that we have this secondary phenomenon we called “Little Brother.” That’s everyone walking around with their videos in their phones, shooting things, putting them on the Internet, sometimes becoming instant news. We have this technology that’s so enabling. Every person can be a mini-surveillance broadcasting system. Then you say, “What’s okay?” There are no answers out there.

JE: On a subtler level the film addresses the fact that while the cameras are capturing all these images nobody seems to be watching, much less responding to anything they see.
AR: Right.

JE: Then you have these crimes occurring right in front of people and they do not notice. If it is not on TV than it is not worth watching. If it is on TV it is worth watching, but there still is no response.

AR: It’s true. People are desensitized. People often are not paying attention. When we were shooting that scene where a man abducts a child and a mother is running around the food court panicking because she couldn’t find her daughter, those people in those seats were not extras. Those are actual mall customers. They just happened to be there. They had no idea a movie was being shot. We had cameras in high corners of rooms where nobody could see them. All of our actors were wearing radio microphones. We said before we shot the scene, “Whatever happens, go with it.” The actor Jennifer Fontaine (playing the mother) said, “You can’t do this to these people. It’s cruel.” I said, “I’m going to call cut in two minutes. They’re going to know it’s a movie.” We thought people were going to come running up to the mother, wanting to help and security people were going to be coming out. Nothing. You saw it. People didn’t react at all. They didn’t want to get involved. They didn’t pay attention. People like to stay in their little secure bubble. They don’t want to pay attention. The same thing holds true in these security offices. There are 30 cameras in the food court, but guys in the office are smoking pot, they’re not paying attention to the monitors. There’s all this technology getting more and more advanced. Is it utilized?

JE: Beyond security measures, why are we keeping and storing so much information?

BS: Paranoia from 9/11. There is a belief that it’s a deterrent. There have been recent polls of the American people and they are overwhelmingly for more cameras. They feel safer when they’re around. This stuff has become really inexpensive and Internet digital technology is a huge enabler. If you had all these cameras and they required a separate recorder and they were producing warehouses of tape, then if you ever had to go look for it, there’s not much you could do with it. But these cameras are on a network. The images are digital. They’re stored on hard drives. Searching for them becomes a visual version of searching through Google. Now you know how quickly you can find things on Google. Well that’s an amazing enabling aspect that puts all those pieces together. Then they put these cameras up at intersections. Okay, we can protect our citizens and give out tickets for running a red light.
AR: And make more money so they can buy more cameras.
BS: They instituted this congestion pricing in London where they have a lot of cameras and they charge you a tax for how often you come into the city. They track it by videoing your license plate. The Mayor of New York City talked about doing the same thing to discourage people from coming in through the bridges. What you see happening is: they’re put there for security and then they start to find other uses for them like traffic enforcement. How long can they keep it? Suppose you ran a red light and there’s a bag of dope in your car. Can you be arrested for that?

JE: The camera cannot smell it. “That is just a bag of herbs.”
AR: [Laughs]. Suppose when they get this facial tracking technology installed. What happens when someone walks into a mall and they have an outstanding ticket and they didn’t show up to court a year ago?
BS: The one thing about technology is that it always gets more powerful and cheaper.
AR: Or what about cases of insurance fraud and they hire a private investigator to track you to make sure you are as injured as you’ve said you are? I wonder if there will be a time in the near future where they won’t need an investigator. They’ll just use the facial tracking technology.
BS: Stakeouts would be much easier.

JE: One of the reasons why you get authentic performances out of your actors is that their characters are unaware they are being watched. As more people become aware that they are being watched – surveillance cameras, reality TV – how do you think that will changes people notions of how to behave for real and how to act for the camera?
BS: I ran AOL. We had about 20,000 employees and there were cameras throughout our campuses. They were not hidden. We told people they were there. Particularly we had cameras in our data centers where people could get to credit card information. People forget they’re there. They become completely immune to that fact that there. And on a fairly regular basis there would be an event like employees having sex somewhere, little acts of sexual harassment, people doing drugs, we had a couple with a cross country relationship and they went into a conference room and she did a striptease for her boyfriend on the other side. Do you really think about the camera in the ATM every time you go up to it?

JE: Yes, and after watching your film I am much more conscious of the fact that I am probably under surveillance on a regular basis.
BS: When I saw the dailies of people walking up to the ATMs with the ATM view, I found those scenes very jarring.
AR: Because the film was made very unconventionally. We shot the film from upper corners of rooms. Everywhere there’s an angle in the film is from when we would go into a location, find where all the real surveillance cameras were and we would put our camera right next to it or right underneath it. We never faked it. We never added another angle just because it was going to help us conveniently tell the story. If we happened to be in a location that didn’t have a surveillance camera, we had a security expert on our team who would help us decipher where the real surveillance camera would go if there were one. Most of the time we where shooting on location. We didn’t close down the mall, the convenience store, or the department store. Everybody you see in the background is real and they don’t know a movie’s being shot. They can’t see the cameras or crew. The actors wore radio microphones so they would be in the middle of the store or department store. They wouldn’t see any of the cameras or us. And very quickly it was easy for them to forget a movie was even being made. As a result, their acting was very natural.

JE: What was the rule about release forms for people who did not know they were being filmed?
AR: We did everything above the board. We would have signs in the mall that would say, “If you’re entering this area, you might be captured on film.” If we interacted with anybody in particular like that scene in the food court where the woman was looking for her daughter and interacting, we had to get them to sign release forms. If we couldn’t get a release form from somebody, we just blurred her or his face out. The idea of this is that it is found footage. If you look at found footage on Cops they blur out faces all the time.

JE: Lastly, you want to provoke discussion for this film. What do you think about these interviews where you talk about yourself and your film? Do you think it serves the work? Should the work speak for itself?

AR: It’s far too complex of an issue for me to say, “I am 100 percent for the cameras” or “I am 100 percent against the cameras.” I’m not Michael Moore. This isn’t a documentary. This is a drama first and foremost and I want it to be entertaining and thought provoking. The more I learn about the issue the more complex the issue becomes. The more I find it impossible to say, “cameras are all good” or “cameras are all bad.”

JE: I doubt you could even pull it off as a documentary. It would be very difficult to get any kind of release forms and with some of those stories you would be accused of exploitation.
AR: Yeah, that’s true [Laughs].

EXCLUSIVE INTERIVEW: MIKE WATT

Mike Watt still clashing with the times.


Legendary bassist to play at Strummerville benefit on Saturday


By Don Simpson

A key figure in the history of music, Joe Strummer, died on December 22, 2002 of an undiagnosed congenital heart defect; he was only 50 years old. Born John Graham Mellor; the co-founder, lyricist, lead singer and rhythm guitarist of the seminal punk band The Clash (and later of The Mescaleros) adopted the moniker “Joe Strummer” to describe his destined role as a rhythm guitar player (naturally left handed, Strummer opted to play guitar right-handed, restricting his abilities to mere strumming).


Seventeen years earlier (December 22, 1985), co-founder, co-lyricist and guitarist for the Minutemen, Dennes Dale Boon (a.k.a. D. Boon), died at the ripe young age of 27 in a car accident. Boon started the Minutemen with his best friends Mike Watt (bass) and George Hurley (drums) in early 1980. They released four LPs and seven EPs, all amazing, all vital, with a majority of their repertoire clocking in around the one-minute mark.


Watt went on to form fIREHOSE (with Hurley); he has also played bass for Porno for Pyros and the recently revitalized Stooges, while juggling several of his own musical endeavors.


Two days after his 50th birthday, Watt will be performing in Los Angeles with his trio Hellride (featuring drummer Stephen Perkins [Jane’s Addiction, Porno for Pyros] and guitarist Peter DiStephano [Porno for Pyros]) at the Strummerville Benefit concert.


Joe Strummer’s wife, Lucinda Tait, established Strummerville shortly after Strummer’s death. The Joe Strummer Foundation “seeks to reflect Joe's unique contribution to the music world by offering support, resources and performance opportunities to artists who would not normally have access to them.” True kindred spirits (though they never met), Strummer and Boon shared a seemingly limitless knowledge of politics and keen ability to coherently siphon their political ideologies into song.


It’s only fitting that Watt jam politico on the Strummerville stage commemorating the two late great punks on the anniversary of their deaths. We could go on and on for hours regarding the significance of The Clash and the enormous hole that Joe Strummer’s death left in the world. Instead we opted to chat with Watt, getting his thoughts on Joe Strummer’s legacy and the politics of music.


JEsther Entertainment: Do you remember the first time you heard The Clash?
Mike Watt: Yeah, it was a single about pirate radio. There’s an antenna on top of the building and it’s about some guy running the play-lists. The pirate radio station was on a boat - that was such a great thing to write a song about. It was called “Captial Radio.” They were idealizing this pirate station on a boat that was outside jurisdiction so the deejay could play anything he wanted. The other guy would give you all the hits to play and keep you in your place; this whole idea that music was connected with hierarchy and the way that people were organized by economics and political structure. We were trying to put together The Minutemen that way. D. Boon wanted the guitars to be all treble so the bass guitar would no longer be in the background, and bring the drums way up. This was a concept of putting non-musical ideas such as democracy into music. Those cats in The Clash were in on that too. Then, the other side of that single is an interview [with Tony Parsons]. They’re riding on a subway talking about how they got the band together. It was a really weird trip. Like when me and D. Boon first saw The Germs, we thought “we could do this.” It was very empowering. Even though it was so alien and foreign and different - the way they talked and their slang and their references. We heard it and thought we could make a band, too.


JE: What does Joe Strummer’s music mean to you?
MW: I put him in a Minutemen song called “History Lesson Part 2” along with Richard Hell and John Doe. Strummer was an early punk rock hero to me and D. Boon. We really only ever knew the early Clash singles and the [eponymous] green album. A lot of the English punk bands were that way. We liked their first album and then after achieving success they turned into, according to us at the time, regular rock bands. Looking back now, I think we were kind of silly. I still don’t really know The Clash music after that. We really liked that green album. I came to find out later on that Joe Strummer said some really nice things about The Minutemen. Wow! We didn’t even know that he knew we even existed! Then he ended up dying on the same day as D. Boon, 17 years later. The Clash songs wondered out loud about why things were the way they were and the way power was divided up amongst people. I think The Minutemen really shared in that. They had two guitars in the band, which was kind of different for a punk band in those days. That organized things differently, gave it a different sensibility. There were just certain things…We thought for sure that Joe Strummer sang with a cigarette in his mouth, [Paul Weller] of The Jam too; then, when we saw The Clash live, Strummer talked between the songs and it was like, “Wow, he sings like he talks.” That blew us away. We saw The Clash play at the Civic Auditorium [in Santa Monica] with Bo Diddley and The Dils. That was the only time we saw them. It was pretty intense. They were playing all of these songs that we didn’t know, since they had made another record [Give ‘Em Enough Rope] by then. That was [February 9,] 1979. And the Clash concert was where we met up with Black Flag. They were handing out flyers. That started that whole trip, making records and touring with them. It was a really profound gig for us. It was like the biggest punk gig, probably a thousand people. In those days that was huge. It was so crowded that I couldn’t get back to the toilets to take a piss. So I pissed right there where I was standing - not on anyone though! We were all shoulder-to-shoulder and no one even knew. I just pissed right there as the gig was going on. And I remember Joe Strummer’s eyes being so white. In arena rock gigs, if you were ever lucky enough to get close, everybody had red eyes. That really tripped me out to see how white Joe Strummer’s eyes were and how intense he played too. He had his own way of playing that was really interesting. And all the slang they used. We didn’t know what the fuck they were talking about because it was so specific. It made us realize that we could sing about San Pedro. Nobody knows about our fucking world either so maybe that’s what they do in this punk thing, just talk about stuff that’s so close to you because it’s intense on you.


JE: What’s your favorite Clash song?
MW: I love “Remote Control,” “Hate and War” and “Janie Jones.” There’s something about “Janie Jones” that is so fucking intense. ‘You’re going to tell them exactly how they feel / pretty bad!’ That is so trippy, a guy singing like that. I heard later that Strummer came from a privileged family. That shows you in the human condition there is so much common ground. You could come from anywhere. I mean, keep it real. What is reality? Art is about transcendence and things. You don’t pick where you’re born but you can pick what you do. Wherever he came from, I don’t give a fuck, I’m just listening to his tunes. His songs touch me, and I come from…wherever.


JE: Are Strummer’s songs still relevant today?
MW: You know that green album was made 32 years ago. Wow, it could have been recorded next week. It’s almost like The Stooges’ Fun House to me, the way it touches me. When I hear, ‘We’re a garage band!’ [“Garageland”] – that is a song for me now. It holds up great! All of it. All of it. I hadn’t heard that record in a long time, but when I listened to it to prepare for this gig it was like the same rush as when I first heard it. I’m not jaded by it. I haven’t figured it all by now. It still has this spirit in it. And the bass lines too. Fuck, I really love the bass lines!


JE: So, what can the Strummerville audience expect from your set?
MW: Well, it’s going to be the old stuff because that’s all I know. We got eight songs from the early singles and the green record, like “1977,” “Complete Control,” “Janie Jones” and “Career Opportunities.” They actually sang about work! The Minutemen all came from working families. My first gig was T.Rex and I don’t remember a lot of songs about work coming from Marc Bolan. There were some from Credence Clearwater Revival, you know, they were probably the only guys singing about work back then. The Clash just came at the right age when we were thinking a lot about those things.


JE: And there haven’t been many bands since The Clash and The Minutemen that have sung about work with such profundity…
MW: There’s another English guy that sings with a British accent, in fact we have the same birthday [December 20, 1957], Billy Bragg. He’s from the old days, too. We talked to him after a Minutemen gig one time. He and D. Boon had no problem. They could just sit in the same room and talk politics on the same level. But you’re right. There isn’t a lot of that anymore.


JE: Do politics belong in music?
MW: Shit yeah, why not?! Music is for expression, which is nothing that we ever thought about before punk; then we realized that songs really could be a vehicle for your expression. You could get stuff off your mind. Everything under the sun you’re wondering about. Of course there’s an art to it, right? That’s up to the individual. But when you talk about the common ground of the human condition, politics is about power and I don’t think that’s a problem that’s ever going to get solved. I don’t know if songs can solve political problems but it lets the mind out to trip on those troubles anyway. A good band is a conversation between the instruments, and between the listener and the dude making the song. Why should it just be [Bill] O’Reilly and [Sean] Hannity on the radio? What?! They’re the only ones who get to talk about this shit? Why can’t people make songs about it and freak on it that way? Or like [John] Coltrane doing “Alabama.” That has no lyrics! He did it all with just a title, but in the music there is a definite awareness about the way that the power is being dealt with. I’ve never been ashamed. I’ve never grown out of that. I feel the same way about music now as I did when I was a kid.
Stummerville will be on Dec. 22 at The Key Club (9039 Sunset Boulevard), doors open at 8 p.m.; tickets for the benefit art $25. In addition to Hellride, Love and Rockets, Zander Schloss & The Wilderness Years, La Plebe, Three Bad Jacks, and The Devildolls Rock 'n' Roll Street Gang are scheduled to perform Strummer’s oeuvre.

Friday, December 14, 2007

MUSIC REVIEW: WIRE'S READ AND BURN 03

Read and Burn the Pink Flag.


Totally wire(d) can't u c ?


By Don Simpson


With the release of their seminal debut, Pink Flag, in 1977 (‘this is ’77 / nearly heaven / it’s black, white, and pink / just think’ - “It’s So Obvious” from Pink Flag), Wire shattered the punk rock mold long before the plaster had time to harden. Their follow-up one-two punch of Chairs Missing and 154 obliterated any previously defined classifications of rock music.


Within a mere four years of their inception, Wire created three masterpieces that influenced an endless menagerie of wannabes and copycats. Forever innovating, forever redefining, forever evolving, Wire has continued to release vital records throughout their 30-year career. That is, in between sabbaticals.


Since their most recent resurrection in 2000, Wire has focused primarily on reappraising the integrity of their history with the release of several classic live performances (on CD and DVD) and re-releases of their aforementioned 1970s material; yet Wire has not eschewed their role in further redefining the future of music, they have released new material on three EPs under the Read and Burn series and one full-length, Send (2003).


Designed as a research and development tool, the Read and Burn series was developed as a way for Wire to do what they want and release it (on their Pink Flag label) when and how they find most appropriate, with no limits or boundaries dictated by a pesky, money grubbing record label. The primary impetus of the EP series is to serve as a testing ground for larger scale projects such as Send.


If the driving shout-rock of Read and Burn 01 read like a denial of the importance of their first three records; then Read and Burn 03 is a 180 degree turn, whole-heartedly embracing their early genius. With the just shy of ten minute long massive attack of “23 Years Too Late” leading the way, Wire deconstructs their early years with eyes wide open. The karmic nature of the recurring bombardment of self-referential statements seems a witty retort to the infinite number of bands that have chosen to mimic early-Wire rather than develop something new and exciting. The 25-minutes of Read and Burn 03 gives those lads (and let’s not forget the lasses) a swift kick in the rump, putting them in their place, showing them how it’s really done, revealing the true kings of this playground. You get the picture.


So, let’s return to the proverbial pink elephant, the menacing monolith of verbal verbosity - “23 Years Too Late.” 23 years ago would be 1984 – did George Orwell’s fictional future of fear finally come to fruition, 23 years later than he predicted (‘fresh from The States with extra fear’)? Part spoken word essay, part post-everything (-punk, -modern, -structuralism) epic; the opening track is filled to the rim, brimming with sometimes meaningful and other-times ambiguous references (including TiLo - member of Tommy Lee’s post-Motley Crue rap-metal hybrid, Methods of Mayhem). Certain fragments border on surrealist nonsense (‘Popeye remembers a cycloptic monster’ or ‘fun-filled firemen visit the Museum of Backward Hats’) while other segments resemble what would have worked brilliantly as a theme for Southland Tales (‘grey hairs genuflect as perforated anarchists / lead the Screw-top Revolution’ or ‘naked punks and stone-hard pagans / sonic paramedics weep / harness short delays’). Attempting to decipher this word-soaked beast reminds me of the closing line of “French Film (Blurred)” from Chairs Missing: ‘the problems of bad reception resulting in blurred perception.’ As I dig deeper, the meaning only becomes more blurred.


The remaining three tracks (“Our Time,” “No Warning Given” and “Desert Diving”) are no less important, despite their shorter (radio friendly) running times. The whole of Read and Burn 03 is the Wire album I have been waiting for since 1980. It is the album that a multitude of lesser-skilled musicians have attempted to create; yet despite the 28-to-30-year-old blueprints laid out before them, no one has been able to master the domain quite like Wire.


‘Practice makes perfect / I’ve done this before’ (“Practice Makes Perfect” from Chairs Missing). Their keen ability to meld intelligent and beguiling lyrics with an intricately manufactured musical framework is unmatched to this day. They remain to be the only fly in the ointment, buzz, buzz, buzzing in your ear…